ãcopyright
Raytheon and Software Productivity Consortium 2002
6th Annual Practical Software and Systems
Measurement Users Group Conference
•What worked
well
–Involvement of SE
Discipline Leads (practitioner leads), addressing various users of information;
–Involving functional leads and engineering managers in defining & prioritizing the measures
–Pressed
measurement issues gently, but consistently
–Leveraging existing data (SEMR charts, existing cost collection systems, etc.)
•What didn’t
work well
–Inconsistent WBS /
cost collection structure across programs; driven by types of business
–Made the
measures TOO transparent to users
•Many aren’t
aware of what’s collected
–Collection of
HR data not progressing